28 May 2016 22:25:15
SAS/ SIXERS/ BOSTON

SAS give LA green
SAS gets Oak

Sixers give Oak
Sixers get #3 pick green young

Boston gives 3# pick young
Boston gets LA.

1.) 28 May 2016
28 May 2016 22:46:40
Not nearly enough for Aldridge.

2.) 29 May 2016
28 May 2016 23:16:08
Confused why Spurs would trade LA for Okafor.

3.) 29 May 2016
29 May 2016 00:21:43
Can you just stop. No one will give the 3rd or 4th pick for Okafor and you will not get 3rd pick plus D. Green (solid sg) and N. Young.

4.) 29 May 2016
29 May 2016 01:26:24
Oak is 10 years younger than LA and would be great long term building block and would open up great amount of cap space (almost 40mil) . The spurs need to build around Kawhi not just retool.

5.) 29 May 2016
29 May 2016 07:32:05
They were second best team in the NBA this year. Their age showed in OKC series. I think a retool is all that is required with a influx of some younger guys. LA is 30 and relies more on skill than athleticism so should age well. Even if your going to trade him surely you can get more value for an all-star and player who made all-nba team. People here are saying Okafor is worth the 3rd pick in this years draft, I think Aldridge's value is higher than that.

6.) 29 May 2016
29 May 2016 09:04:23
If Okafor is a building block - why 76ers and their fans want a trade? From what I see in the posts Okafor is one of the best young 5 in NBA - why trade such a flawless player?

7.) 29 May 2016
29 May 2016 14:02:54
JKubacki: Sixer fans do not WANT to trade Okafor. But its clear that if they draft Simmons AND Saric comes over AND Embiid can play, someone has to go. Its most likely Okafor or Noel. So don't confuse WANT with the reality of the situation.

Two, being one the best young centers in the NBA does not mean he's flawless.

Third, I'm not sure why I even took 3 minutes of my time to respond to your obvious snark.

Lastly, the Spurs don't need to move LA. That's nuts. They have a mess of Euro's stashed away right now that can move into their lineup to build around LA.