14 Aug 2016 03:51:00
Sixers Cavs lakers
Based on trade ideas of seen.

Cavs trade love
Cavs get Noel

Sixers trade Noel
Sixers get Ingram

Lakers trade Ingram
Lakers get love.


1.) 14 Aug 2016
14 Aug 2016 04:32:34
Ingram is worth way more.


2.) 14 Aug 2016
14 Aug 2016 04:32:49
Sixers fan lol.


3.) 14 Aug 2016
14 Aug 2016 05:03:20
LOL. Noel for Ingram? HA! No way Lakers trade Ingram for Ingram and Love. Absurd.


4.) 14 Aug 2016
14 Aug 2016 05:16:12
Come on... This is a terrible trade


5.) 14 Aug 2016
14 Aug 2016 05:43:31
Meant to say trade Ingram for love not Ingram and love.


6.) 14 Aug 2016
14 Aug 2016 05:50:11
Let's settle this, Lakers are not trading Ingram anytime soon.


7.) 14 Aug 2016
14 Aug 2016 13:19:02
I love the preface of based on ideas he's seen.

I would love for you to point to where anyone posted Ingram for Noel. I must have missed that nonsense.


8.) 14 Aug 2016
14 Aug 2016 13:40:12
The fact that the sixers trade Ingram and receive Noel.


9.) 14 Aug 2016
14 Aug 2016 13:55:26
I would do this trade.


10.) 14 Aug 2016
14 Aug 2016 14:34:16
Please explain why anybody but the 76ers would do this trade?

I understand overvaluing your own players but you 76ers fans are something special. Even if your values are off at least consider the fit of the players to the other teams in the trade.


11.) 14 Aug 2016
14 Aug 2016 15:24:10
I feel the same way. Ingram seems valuable to me. However this wasn't my idea. I saw it on a few bs rumor sites. It's just funny that so many runors sites had this trade or a part of this trade.

I do see the lakers getting better. They get a former star in Kevin love for Ingram. That makes sense to me a bit. So la might agree.

Sixers of course agree. No brainier there.

Cavs I don't know why but they hate Kevin love. If they read ekevin love and get Noel I think they get slightly better. They will have more cap room. Resign jr. Plus Noel on the Cavs I still say would be a much more complete team. His defense would be awesome on a great team where he doesn't have to score.

So in a way. The trade makes sense. But it all depends on if la still wants Kevin love.


12.) 14 Aug 2016
14 Aug 2016 15:30:54
Maybe LA does want Love, but not giving up Ingram for him.


13.) 14 Aug 2016
14 Aug 2016 16:02:04
Btw I heard it on a bunch of bs trade site. Yabida, inquister, and then christiantoday or something. Then there's three other who names I can't remember.

Those sites only said Noel of Ingram straight up.

I thought that made no sense. But with the Cavs rumor Noel for love out there I combine the rumors to make sense for all teams. Ingram for love makes sense for la.

Noel for Ingram clearly makes sense for Philly.

Cavs trading love for Noel makes some sense if they want to clear cap space

JUST GOOGLE NOEL FOR INGRAM AND WATCH WHAT SHOWS UP.


14.) 14 Aug 2016
14 Aug 2016 16:13:44
Clarkson/ Randle would be a better package.


15.) 14 Aug 2016
14 Aug 2016 16:15:33
No one cares about the bs the websites which are ALWAYS WRONG posts about. They have no credibility. Just because the lakers get Love for Ingram, it doesn't mean the Sixers could just run away with just trading Noel for Ingram. No team was willing to give a top five pick for Okafor or Noel. Now you want the second pick in the draft straight up?


16.) 14 Aug 2016
14 Aug 2016 17:46:07
The king

I mixed two trades as I said

The one rumor was love for Noel

The other was Noel for Ingram.

This way lakers get a star in love.
Cavs get Noel
And Sixers get Ingram.

All based on the trsde sites just mixed a bit. I would assume la would want love over Noel.


17.) 14 Aug 2016
14 Aug 2016 20:31:56
The trade I saw was Ingram for Noel and our 2017 1st back.


18.) 15 Aug 2016
14 Aug 2016 23:15:04
You are so full of it. I read all those articles. They then go on to say the sixers need to add substantially for the lakers to even listen. There is no way in hell this is a decent trade. Every article you read says it's a terrible trade for the lakers.

So how do you laugh that they mention this? You go, oh this trade was posed on a couple sites, and it wasn't. It was Noel and a hell of a lot more, either big men or picks. but you don't want to include that because again, you feel Noel is a top 5 big man in the league. Or at least should have that value. Ridiculous as always. Just a heads up, it's junk like this as to why few actually respect your valuations. It is just beyond laughable. You couldn't come close to getting the 3 this year for Noel. But wait! Now you want the two. A pick which was worlds more valuable in a two person draft.

It's tiring reading your crap.


19.) 15 Aug 2016
14 Aug 2016 23:28:29
What I don't understand is why everyone thinks Ingram is going to be way better then Noel/ Okafor. Ingram has only played in summer league games. Who knows he could be a bust. i'm not saying Noel is going to be better then Ingram or the other way around. People are over valuing Ingram just as much Noel or Okafor. that's all i'm saying.

Im not a fan of either of these teams by the way.


20.) 15 Aug 2016
15 Aug 2016 13:15:08
Hamburger. So you read one of the six. One of the six article I read had a version saying that. The rest were Noel for Ingram. Period. You need to relax dude.

The king

If those are bs trade site wat do you call this site where in informed people post unlikely trades that never happen?


21.) 15 Aug 2016
15 Aug 2016 13:35:05
No. No they aren't. I know it's odd but I heard a rumor that summer league wasn't the first minute of Ingram playing basketball.

He was a equality second pick overall. Neither Noel nor okafor are worth a second pick overall. Ergo. Ingram is more valuable.

If you need help I can draw a diagram as well?


22.) 15 Aug 2016
15 Aug 2016 16:51:38
Hamburger.

For me if the draft is crap then the second pick is not as valuable as another higher talent drafts second pick. So not all draft are the same.

Second, once a guy I drafted his value changes. For instance, jaylen brown. Most had him going out of the top five this year. However just because Boston chose him third doesn't change his value.

Thirdly, I love Ingram. He was definately the second best player in this draft. That being said I think Okafor was clearly the second best player last year. Again value of a player isn't based on draft position. It's based on talented the long haul.

In other word Ingram for Okafor makes sense to me talent wise. I don't agree with Ingram for Noel talent wise. Ingram has more upside.


23.) 15 Aug 2016
15 Aug 2016 17:20:04
Draft is crap from 3 on. Noel wasn't worth the 3rd in that crap.

But you want one of the two elite. Again, we get it. You took only the portion of the trade you liked. Eliminated the other part. And then claimed sources said it.

I read an article that said porzingis for curry and durant.

The second portion said it was the dumbest trade idea ever. But using your classic tactics. I'll ignore that. And just claim sources told me. Seriously. Stop trying to explain it. We get it. You adjusted a trade. And now trying to actually rationalize how an average starter in now is worth a max player in love or a top candidate in Ingram. Just stop.


24.) 16 Aug 2016
16 Aug 2016 02:09:50
Ingram and mozgov for love a better trade.