18 May 2016 01:44:53
Sixers and lakers should both be happy.

Now Sixers beat lakers package for Paul goerge.

Sixers trade number one pick in the draft, lakers pick next year, okafor or Noel ( pacers choice)

Pacers trade Paul goerge and hill.

1.) 18 May 2016
18 May 2016 02:29:47
Although I wouldn't do it as a lakers fan,

Russell, Randle, and #2 is still a better package for PG.

2.) 18 May 2016
18 May 2016 02:47:46
Pacers are giving up way too much.

3.) 18 May 2016
18 May 2016 03:45:21
Ya it should be interesting to see who out of Lakers, Sixers and Celtics get either of the superstars in Butler and George who appear as attainable as superstars get. All have good young assets and picks. If pacers want a complete rebuild I can see them taking a deal like this from Sixers and get a young big to pair with Turner and Simmons or Ingram to replace and grow into George's role. Celtics offer some more ready to contribute pieces in Crowder and Bradley and too many draft picks to even use so if Pacers want to stay competitive they may go that route.

4.) 18 May 2016
18 May 2016 04:50:11
@Daniel20 no I don't think it is
#1>#2
Okafor>Russell
Lakers pick 2017>Randle (probably, let's be honest if no star comes it will be)

If Noel is included instead of okafor it's more fair but I'd still take the 76ers offer if I'm the pacers.

5.) 18 May 2016
18 May 2016 06:07:13
@HDC9
Ingram and Simmons are pretty equal
Okafor > Russell? Really? Okay LOL
2017 pick probably won't be top 5 and theirs a chance not even top 10.

6.) 18 May 2016
18 May 2016 11:40:09
Daniel. You're wrong. All around. No indications it won't be top 10. Based on value you right now, okafor is better. And to try and say the 2 pick is the same as a 1 pick. Well. That's just foolish. Sixers deal is better.

7.) 18 May 2016
18 May 2016 13:40:15
Anyone who says Russell Randel and number two is better package is completely blind and can't do math which is kinda sad.