20 Nov 2015 16:55:29
Cle/IndLal
Cle gets paul George and brandon bass
Pg. Irving/ williams
Sg. shumpurt/smith
Sf. Lebron/ jefferson
Pf. George/ Bass
C. Mozgov/Thompson
Lal get kevin love and George hill cj miles Anderson V.
Pg. Hill/russel
Sg. Clarkson/miles
Sf. Bryant
Pf. Love/Andy
C. Hibbert
Ind gets juluis randle louis williams ryan kelly larry nance jr Lal first rounder.
Pg. williams/stucky
Sg. Ellis/ Robinson
Sf. Hill/ larry nance
Pf. Randal/kelly
C. mahmi.
20 Nov 2015 17:16:01
IND says Hell No.
20 Nov 2015 17:25:13
They got rid of all there vets there in a rebuild stage. Why not get younger there not going to win a ring this year or in 4 to 5 years they will lose him for nothing.
20 Nov 2015 18:24:08
Wait seriously? The lakers give up one starter who isn't that special and a pick and get a franchise player and a good starting pg? No chance.
Indiana says no because they get a ton of fillers. One decent prospect. And a draft pick. For a nice pg and a franchise cornerstone. It's awful. Well, except for the lakers and the cavs.
20 Nov 2015 18:45:08
Actualy lakers give up a starter and prospect with potential. The sixth man of the year. Ryan a stretch four and nance a young small forward and a top 10 pick which would be tradable if they wanted to do it for a player.
20 Nov 2015 19:53:29
One starter who isn't special? Ok whatever you say pizza he's only 20 years old.
20 Nov 2015 20:01:55
Look, if IND would accept that kind of package for George, then if i were the Lakers, i will do it just with IND and take CLE out of that deal. I would rather take George to replace Kobe than getting Kevin Love. and i would do it even if Russell is included. But then again. IND says Hell no.
20 Nov 2015 22:00:06
Cavs would need to add more.
20 Nov 2015 22:43:33
Hes just a prospect. He has proved nothing thus far besides being a prospect. Why in the world would IND trade a stud for that? They could trade George for 3 1sts easily.
21 Nov 2015 01:23:52
Look I know pacers say hell no and but Randle is a good prospect with good potential. I know you think he'll suck but some other people think he can succeed.
21 Nov 2015 03:40:17
Lets not forget who love is. 20 10 guy. He can't play east coast ball. He needs to be on a team that runs and don't play defense.
21 Nov 2015 14:01:23
Never said he'll suck. No idea where you got that. I said he's a prospect. Stop overthinking everything.
Fuquajay, come on. That's ridiculous.
21 Nov 2015 15:05:32
Remember when I posted a trade idea of him and you said all this stuff about his T. rex arms and how he will be a bust?
21 Nov 2015 16:07:32
No. Clearly you don't read fully. I said he isn't a star. He is slow. And he isn't this full fledged all star. Didn't realize the evaluation was simply black and white. So if not a star that means he sucks? Interesting view point i guess.
21 Nov 2015 16:31:48
You said he wouldn't be successful. And he is not slow at all. Maybe if you actually WATCHED him play you would know he is not slow at all. clearly you want to think what you've thought from day one. No just because you said he won't be a star doesn't mean I think he will be a bust. Don't know how you got that.
21 Nov 2015 17:09:51
If you actually listened to what I said, it's very true. He came into the league being a scorer/rebounder. but without good defense. Thus far, yes, he is able to put up some points and grab boards. But his defense is significantly subpar. There is no indication that this will be fixed. Offense, you can change your shot, learn schemes, what not. Defense, you have to have a mentality which by all projections, he doesn't have and hasn't have. To consider someone a star, they need to be a two way player. Or at least have one side that is elite and outweighs the negatives of the other. Paul George is elite on both sides. Kevin love is elite offensively/rebounding, especially when the focus in an offense. Randle doesn't seem like he will fit either of those two groups. So again, he isn't the star you seem to think he is. He's a prospect right now. Perhaps hell be around 15/10.which is very nice, but by no means warrants a star return in a trade. that's the point.
22 Nov 2015 03:57:23
Randle could be elite offensively he has the potential. Yes his defense is bad and needs work but when he's slow on his rotations his speed makes it up.
I said that the pacers would say no and won't alone warrant a star.