28 May 2024 18:23:02
Mavs are in the finals. And if we are honest, Mavs are build to beat the Celtics as well.

Would be boring.

No trades needed anymore. No chats for proposals anymore.

Mavs get the rings.

So keep it easy for next season:

ATL Hardaway, 1st
DAL Hunter

28 May 2024 22:05:03
I like Hunter, but his rep is that he's not worth his contract. Why not keep Jones Jr who'll be much cheaper and keep the 1st?

29 May 2024 07:53:11
Mavs keep Jones Jr. anyways.

Hunter has a stronger body can play sf/ pf. He could be a sleeper like Washington. In any case he is an athletic defender and inside/ outside scorer that Mavs can use in any case. Having Hardy you do not need Hardaway anymore.

29 May 2024 11:52:17
Hunter would look a lot better away from Trae young.

29 May 2024 11:42:02
Not sure Washington is a sleeper, he's no better now than he was before.

30 May 2024 05:16:14
They got Washington for cheap meaning he didn't have a lot of perceived value league wide. His defense has improved significantly and he's playing a role on a winning team very different than putting up numbers on a rubbish team.

30 May 2024 08:21:49
Would you take Brooklyns Bridges over Hunter? Propably yes. : ) But Mavs are already in the Finals (at least those days : ) and Hunter would improve the team. Y do not need more, than to win. Even if Mavs could affords the asset to trade for Bridges it may be an option to keep assets for trades in the future - Kyrie will not play for ever.

30 May 2024 12:55:28
They did not get Washington for cheap, and in fact overpaid for him when factoring in what they had just given up to get Grant Williams. Horrible asset management, which they have a history of (Brunson) .

30 May 2024 16:29:32
As a Hawks fan I like the deal but it wouldn't work because of Bogdanavic. Hardaway would have to be a 6th man for us.

01 Jun 2024 02:12:49
Yeah Washington actually wasn't cheap but sunken cost on Williams. If they can keep Luka the pick will be trash anyway . Kyrie better fit than brunson.